Shame on Kamloops Judge Blair
Kamloops B.C. Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair
Accepted Standard
Image   Court ordered closed trial, no witnesses and no cross-examination permitted.
Image   Proof of unlawful claims by Kamloops Judge Blair exist, yet the ability to present evidence of fraud is
      prevented.
Image   Alleged evidence did not appear anywhere. Judge Blair fails to dispute the proof of fraud.
Image   Both law and evidence are withheld by Judge Blair in order to provide a benefit.
Image   Justice Blair's dinner at the homes of witnesses, refusal to step aside from judgement.
Image   A Government & Canadian Judicial Council accepted standard of fraud within Canadian courts.
Image   Fabricated reports, simple correspondence are considered by Judge Blair to be expert doctor medical
      reports.
Image   Justice Blair's alleged experts, employed by doctors, did not see the Plaintiff's evidence.
Image   The Canadian Government claims independence from the courts and does nothing setting this as the
      accepted standard of conduct expected by a Supreme Court Judge..
Image   The Canadian Judicial Council is a method for government to conceal the fraud and corruption within
      Canadian Courts
Image   Fraud. Dr. White is paid for the same attendance Justice Blair claimed never happened.
Approved Acceptance
Image   When proof of unlawful conduct and fraud by a Judge had been presented.
Image   When alleged evidence failed to appear anywhere. Judge Blair does not dispute fraud.
Image   When Judge Blair refused to step aside from his involvement with the witnesses.
Image   When Court Costs are awarded for benefit resulting from Judicial fraud and unlawful claims.
Image   When a fair trial with an impartial Judge was not available to a Canadian family.
The Facts
Image   Justice Blair would not permit a trial with witnesses or cross-examination, freewheeling his
      judgement.
Image   Government Medical billing records prove Dr. White got paid for the same attendance claimed to
      never happened by Justice Blair. The attendance not disputed by anyone other than the judge.
Image   Judge Blair was involved with the evidence, having dinner at the homes of his alleged experts
      employed by the doctors. He refused a request that he step aside from judgement.
Image   Justice Blair made allegations that failed to appear anywhere within the evidence.
Image   The Court of Appeal would not hear an appeal, making fraudulent, unlawful allegations in support of
      Judge Blair.
No Expaination
Image   Not providing reasons for over-ruling the many material objections.
Image   Reasons for ordering a closed court and not permitting the cross examination of experts.
Image   Alleged experts, employed by doctors, failed to see any evidence presented by the Plaintiff.
Image   Alleged experts that failed to see the evidence when fraud is claimed have no credibility.
Image   Exclusions of material evidence, law, health records and the constructive elimination of legitimate
      evidence in order to provide benefit. Judge Blair fails to dispute fraud.
Image   Judge Blair falsified reports for benefit. Correspondence deemed medical reports.
Image   Allegations that are not supported by any evidence.
Image   The nature of his friendships and dinner parties at the homes of witnesses providing evidence.
Image   Reasons for not stepping aside from judgement when this had been requested.
Image   Ordering the reading from affidavits to be stopped, not permitting the use of notes.
Image   Doctors' not able to provide any evidence of Justice Blair's alleged consent.
Image   Prohibiting the use of medical journals, doctors' reports and other evidence for cross-examination.
Accepted Standard
Image   When a request to present proof of fraud and a formal hearing was made.
Image   When Judge Blair has made unsupportable, fraudulent allegations.
Image   When Canadian Courts do not normally consider complaints into the unlawful conduct of a Judge.
Image   When Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin has covered the misconduct of Justice Blair and has
      participated in this fraud..
Reasons to Disclose Evidence
Image   The evidence fails to support Justice Blair's allegations.
Image   To provide the evidence. Justice Blair does not dispute the proof of fraud.
Image   To present the Government of Canada position for equality purposes and future complaints.
Image   To present the Canadian Judicial Council position for equality purposes and future complaints.
Image   To present evidence for the equal application of Canadian Law as found in this case.
Image   To be on the record. Nothing disputes the proof of fraud and this Internet website.
Image   To assist in restoring some character of this family, fraudulently taken by Justice Blair.
Image   To respond to Government Internet web sites containing unlawful claims which the government has
      refused to remove..
Image   To provide an easy reference for all Canadians, Supreme Courts, Appeal Courts, Judges, Government
      of Canada and the Canadian Judicial Council as it relates to the equal application of Canadian Law
      as it is found within this case.
Intention tom Present Evidence
Image   Justice Blair was involved with the evidence before him, attending dinner at the home of doctors and
      refused stepping aside.
Image   Unlawful conduct, constructive application of evidence, obstruction of justice and untrue claims.
Image   A court ordered closed court. A request for a trial and cross-examination was denied.
Image   B.C. Medical billing records seriously contradict Justice Blair's allegations regarding attendance.
Image   Fraudulent claims made by Judge Blair are posted on Government Internet sites.
Image   Legitimate material evidence was constructively excluded from judgement or simply never appeared.
Image   Both law and evidence withheld in order to provide for benefit.
Image   Fraud... Claims alleged by Justice Blair failed to appear anywhere within the evidence.
Image   Judge Blair applies Canadian law in an inconsistent manner for doctor benefit.
Hidden Decisons
Image   Judge Blair has a big cowardly yellow stripe running down the front of his belly... who will not
      challenge this website because truth will remove him from being a crooked, fraudulent judge.
Image   Canadian Judicial Council permits judicial fraud and a judge like Judge Blair to make allegations that
      fail to appear anywhere. Future abitity to get equality or truth in law. All equality rights are claimed
      by this family.
Image   The ability to present proof relating to judicial fraud and misconduct shall not be provided when a
      judge has falsified medical reports for benefit.
Image   The ability to present proof relating to judicial involvement shall not be provided when a judge
      attends dinner at the homes of witnesses.
Image   The Government has deemed the independence of courts, judges fraud and misconduct as the same.
      All future equality rights are claimed.
Image   The ability to present proof relating to judicial fraud and misconduct shall not be provided when a
      judge alleged evidence that failed to appear anywhere. All future equality rights are claimed.
Image   The ability to present proof relating to judicial fraud and misconduct shall not be provided when a
      judge has awarded Court Costs based upon fraud and unsupported allegations. All future equality
      rights are claimed. The Government of Canada has claimed this is not judicial misconduct.
Image   It is not Fraud for a judge to make allegations that fail to appear anywhere. All equality rights are
      claimed.
Image   The Canadian Government is not getting involved in this case setting a precedent for the future.

A Government accepted judicial standard permitting a judge to make serious unsupported allegations that fail to appear anywhere within the evidence and have dinner with witnesses.Total acceptance by the Prime Minister's office, Ministry of Justice and Chief Justice of Canada. Dr. Philip Anthony White getting paid for the same attendance alleged to never happened is fraud. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent. The Justice Ministry of Canada within a letter states "With regard to your concerns with the court decisions being available on the Internet, I would like to point out that all court decisions have always been a matter of public record in Canada. This aspect of our judicial system is seen as a safeguard to fairness, openness, and democracy."
The Prime Ministers office within a letter states "While careful consideration has been given to your description of the difficulties you have experienced, this office is unable to intervene in any way in this situation." The Canadian Judicial Council within a letter states "Associate Chief Justice Osborne has asked me to advise you that there is no basis for your allegations on the part of Justice Blair." The Canadian Judicial Council within a letter states "Please be advised that any further correspondence in this matter will remain without reply and will simply be filed."
The Canadian Judicial Council within a letter states "In the circumstances, as there is no basis for any further action by the Council pursuant to its mandate under the Judges Act, Associate Chief Justice Osborne has directed me to close the file with this reply." The Canadian Judicial Council within a letter states "Please be advised that any further correspondence in this matter will remain without reply and will be simply filed." The Justice Ministry of Canada within a letter states "I symapthize with the distress you have been experiencing. However , I must tell you that it would be inapproperate for me to comment on the particulars of this case."
The Canadian Judicial Council within a letter states "Your allegation that the judge did not permit the examination of witnesses cannot be sustained since this was a summary trial and not a trial." The Canadian Judicial Council within a letter states "The issue of Mr. Justice Blair"s acquaintance with the doctor was raised before the Court of Appeal which found that such a ground had no chance of success in that court." The Justice Ministry within a letter states "Thank you again for writing. I regret that I am unable to help you in the way that you may have perhaps hoped"

Fraud on Alleged Consent Image
Dr. Philip Antony White
Kelowna, British Columbia
Fraud, bias and a total lack of credibility is claimed on the part of Justice Blair. The Plaintiff asked that Justice Blair provide his evidence to support the allegations, this request was denied. Dr. Philip A. White did not produce the evidence to support allegations including the alleged consent. In an effort to avoid further unsupported claims, a formal public cross-examination of Justice Blair is required. This family is not willing to accept the current and any further unsupported allegations. The Government of Canada has not requested Judge Blair produce his alleged evidence nor explain, an accepted standard and a precedent in Canadian law.

Image    Justice Richard Blair must be removed from the Supreme Court.    ImageUnderhanded
Image    There is proof that Kamloops B.C. Justice Richard Blair is a fraud.    ImageDishonest
            Canada Law Courts Logo
Canadalawcourts.com
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 all rights reserved.