canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement, canadian, department, justice, canada, approved, law, legal, case, decision, standard, conduct, misconduct, fraud, construction, constructive, evidence, federally, parliament, appointed, supreme, court, judges, judgement,

It would be Justice Blair's inability to provide thoughtful answers and his inability to defend his conclusions that will uncover a constructive application of evidence, exclusions of evidence that provided benefit within judgement and fraudulent claims.

Warning: Inability to defend conclusions.
Judge Blair fails to dispute fraud.

             

Small Chk

   Justice Richard Blair must be removed from the Supreme Court.

Image

   Justice Richard Blair must be made to answer questions.

Shame on British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair. Fraud is claimed on issues of alleged consent and alleged evidence that failed to appear.

A Canadian Precedent in Law.

[ Beginning of Website ]

[ Introduction to Courts ]

[ Methods of Fraud ]

[ Tell-a-Friend ]

[ Executive Summary ]

[ Editorial Comment Board ]

     
         
     

Canadalawcourts.com
Copyright © 2002 - 2006 all rights reserved.

Image

Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair Kamloops, B.C.

Image